[Digikam-devel] 0.11.0 (or 1.0.0) beta1 ?

[Gilles Caulier]

2009/5/13 Andi Clemens <andi.clemens at gmx.net>:
> About regression tests:
> Are there any unit tests for digiKam?

well not yet.

> It often happens that we break things that worked before, with unit tests this
> could be easily avoided.
> I know tests are hard to write, especially on already existing code. But maybe
> we already have something and I'm not aware of that?
> Hidden somewhere in the dark corners of the SVN server :-) ?

no.

Gilles

>
> Andi
>
>
> On Wednesday 13 May 2009 20:31:04 Gilles Caulier wrote:
>> 2009/5/13 Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de>:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I thinking to make a beta 1 release soon. A lots of bugs have been
>> >> fixed since 0.10.0, and we cannot delay to the end of year for bugfix.
>> >>
>> >> About new feature, this can be continued during beta stage...
>> >>
>> >> What do you think about ?
>> >
>> > My main new feature is the icon view model/view which is not yet enabled.
>> > It's the question to enable it, release beta1 freshly afterwards, and
>> > receive many bug reports, or add it after beta1, do not get public
>> > testing but more internal testing to iron out bugs before going public.
>>
>> Well, i'm agree to enable it. first test are fine. Of course bugs and
>> regression will be found, i'm sure. beta release are dedicated to
>> solve that.
>>
>> Before to release a beta, let's me hear how many time you need to
>> polish code and prepare tests in public. I will post release plan...
>>
>> Gilles
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>