[Digikam-devel] digikam 0.11.0 or 1.0.0 ?

[Gilles Caulier]

Marcel, your viewpoint ?

Gilles

2009/5/11 Andi Clemens <andi.clemens at gmx.net>:
> I also would vote for 1.0.0.
> 0.11 really sounds like earliest development status, but digiKam exists for
> more then 8 years. 1.0.0 doesn't mean it's final, just "good enough to work
> with it", at least for me. And digiKam has this status since a few years :-)
>
> As Arndt mentioned, the debugging / beta testing phase should be a little bit
> longer, so that this major version jump is running smoothly.
>
> Andi
>
> On Monday 11 May 2009 10:34:22 Gilles Caulier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The question is open. After a long time, I'm fine to switch version id
>> to 1.0.0.
>>
>> Andi, Marcel, Mik, Mathias, Julien, Gerhard, etc... Your viewpoints ?
>>
>> Gilles
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>