[Digikam-devel] digikam 0.11.0 or 1.0.0 ?

[Andi Clemens]

I also would vote for 1.0.0.
0.11 really sounds like earliest development status, but digiKam exists for 
more then 8 years. 1.0.0 doesn't mean it's final, just "good enough to work 
with it", at least for me. And digiKam has this status since a few years :-)

As Arndt mentioned, the debugging / beta testing phase should be a little bit 
longer, so that this major version jump is running smoothly.

Andi

On Monday 11 May 2009 10:34:22 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The question is open. After a long time, I'm fine to switch version id
> to 1.0.0.
>
> Andi, Marcel, Mik, Mathias, Julien, Gerhard, etc... Your viewpoints ?
>
> Gilles
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel