[Digikam-devel] digikam wiki [[was: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
arnd.baecker at web.de
Fri Jun 29 11:57:17 BST 2007
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> 2007/6/27, Arnd Baecker <arnd.baecker at web.de>:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabien wrote:
> > Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > > The Wiki question from fred is an important and redondant question.
> > > major opensource project has an user wiki.
> > Yes, I agree. And we already spoke about that a few months ago.
> > >
> > > This point has already discuted in this room. a wiki hosted in
> > > digikam.org <http://digikam.org> will be the hell to drive. A good
> > > alternative is to use kde.org <http://kde.org> wiki :
> > >
> > > http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=Digikam
> > >
> > > I think we most promote this site as well everywhere... Your
> viepoints ?
> > I just check that there's now an anti-bot system. So, we can hope
> > won't be too much spam on it.
> > So, let's advertise !
> hmm, shouldn't there be at least a little bit of structure
> before advertising?
> of course... else the wiki will be unreadable...
> Otherwise it seems likely that it will grow wildly, from the start.
> Maybe one additional level, like
> General information:
> - link to documentation
> - handbook
> - homepage
> - etc.
> Topics in this wiki:
> - Managing images
> - Editing images
> - Geolocalization (GPS)
> - FAQ
> - Tips, tricks and scripts
> Why not..
> And then there is the unsolved question,
> how/when/if to transfer wiki contents into the the contents
> at digikam.org and the excellent handbook!
> Just my 0.5 cent,
> I recommend to post a message in digikam-user ML and a blog entry about this
> #digikam IRC channel can be dedicaced for help users who want contribute to
> wiki contents in live
> This is not a problem for developpers, because we have another IRC channel
> for that : #digikam-devel (not yet used, but created a few years ago by Tom)
OK, I defaced the digikam wiki, ;-)
please add whatever you think is necessary before we make
the announcement and then see how it develops.
((Presently it does not look fancy, but that's ok for me,
only the main digikam page should look cool ;-))
More information about the Digikam-devel