[Digikam-devel] Future plans : 0.9.2-final and KDE4 port...
Fabien
fabien.ubuntu at gmail.com
Wed Jun 13 11:07:45 BST 2007
Hi Gilles and everybody,
Gilles Caulier wrote:
>
> See below the future digiKam plans :
>
> [...]
Don't you think it's time to use a new version numbering schema ?
I think digiKam has reached its stability point.
For most people, when you see a 0.9.x version, it means the software is
quite close to a stable 1.0 version.
Using version 0.10 let digiKam looks as an immature software that lacks
reliability and features. And I definitively think it's not the case !
Creating a 1.0 version would put digiKam under spotlight and that would
be great...
I also think it's important to clearly separate kde3 versions and kde4
version.
This is why I make the following proposal :
- create a 1.0.0 for the next digiKam version (instead of 0.9.2)
0.9.3 would be 1.0.1
- use 2.0 for kde4 port
> DIGIKAM 0.9.3 RELEASE:
> ------------------------------------
>
> DIGIKAM 0.10.0 RELEASE (KDE4 PORT):
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> This is the future : the famous KDE4/Qt4/CMake port....
>
>
> How many time will take KDE4 port ?
>
> Good question : this depand of free time available. There are some
> scripts to use to simplify task, but personally i don't like script
> source code converters (:=))). The code can be completly unreadable and
> this is not the better way to learn the new API.
>
> I think we can plan to have a full port of digiKam for september (2007
> of course)...
As an end user, I think it's too early to migrate to KDE4. I think it
would have been better to do that in around 6 months...
Personaly, I won't migrate to KDE4 before at least 1 year. I'm also
curious to see when distributions will put KDE4 by default. I guess it's
better to have kde4 desktop with some kde3 softs than the contrary, but
maybe I'm wrong ?
But, I fully understand that developpers are willing to migrate very
soon :) And you, developpers, work hard enough to choose whenever to
want to use new kde4, so I won't complain :)
--
Fabien
More information about the Digikam-devel
mailing list