[Digikam-devel] RFC: The breakage of the year, our libraries

Angelo Naselli anaselli at linux.it
Sun Dec 30 18:35:21 GMT 2007

> I haven't done one for libkipi, since i'm not a real libkipi hacker and
> I'm not sure where to put the method... 
Ok since Gilles wants to take version.h i'll propose the following way, that
i don't like very much though, but it should work as well. The attached patch
is for libkipi, but i'll apply to all if ok to avoid too many places in which
adding the version (I know i could patch configure.in.in and propagate... maybe
in future).

At last i patched also configure.in.in that should avoid VISIBILITY warning,
but i don't know if it can have some obscure to me side effects...

Any comments?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20071230/8e2ae010/attachment.sig>

More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list