[Digikam-devel] KDE Handbook conformance

[Gilles Caulier]

On Wednesday 13 September 2006 08:08, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> As you know, the digikam, digikamimageplugins and kipi-plugins
> documentation is great, but not conforming to the KDE docbook standard in
> many ways (as defined in http://l10n.kde.org/docs/markup/index.html). We
> use docbook tags that are pruned by KDE, like <figure> or <graphic> etc.
> That is the reason why we can't compile our docbooks against DocBook XML
> V4.2-Based Variant V1.1//EN and why
> http://www.englishbreakfastnetwork.org/sanitizer/index.php?component=extrag
>ear&module=graphics shows so many errors in our docs.
>
> Now I started to rework the digikam docbook to make it conform (no commit
> yet) - it's a tedious but manageable task. Of course the looks change, for
> the better I don't know! The annex contains a screenshot of the conforming
> look. What do you think? Shall I go ahead?

Fine for me Gerhard. I will take a look into the KDE docbook notice

Gilles