Issue 232: 22nd April 2012 out and Akademy talk questions

[Vladislav Blanton]

Thanks team. You three have been holding it down impressively.

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Marta Rybczynska
<kde-i18n at rybczynska.net>wrote:

> Hello all,
> I've just submitted #232 to Dot.Thanks to Multu and Jaka!
>
> I have also some questions for you about the way you work on the Digest and
> the things you'd like to see in the future. If you have any other comments,
> add them too!
>
> 0. Are you a developer?
>
> 1. What do you do when you're reviewing a commit (deciding if it should be
> included or not)? Do you look in the source code? Do you read the commit
> message?  Is the length of this message important? Are the special tags
> (DIGEST, REVIEW, BUG...) important? Do you look at the commiter name?
>
> 2. What happens if you find too many interesting commits (above our 5%
> rule)?
>
> 3. What do you do if you see many commits from a single project, where you
> feel that none of them should be included separately?
>
> 4. When classifying, how do you make the difference between a feature and
> a bug fix?
>
> 5. When classifying, how often do you remove commits?
>
> 6. When writing a summary, what commits you include? With long messages?
> From
> well-known projects? With many changes in many files? With the tags?
>
> 7. Do you want more people to include the DIGEST tag? If so, when?
>
> 8. Do you want more such special tags? Which ones?
>
> 9. Do you have other suggestions?
>
> Thanks in advance for all input you have. It will make the presentation
> better
> and, I hope, improve the workflow between us and the developers.
>
> Thanks all,
> Marta
> _______________________________________________
> Digest mailing list
> Digest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digest/attachments/20120428/8eb55088/attachment.html>