Issue 232: 22nd April 2012 out and Akademy talk questions

[Marta Rybczynska]

Hello all,
I've just submitted #232 to Dot.Thanks to Multu and Jaka!

I have also some questions for you about the way you work on the Digest and 
the things you'd like to see in the future. If you have any other comments, 
add them too!

0. Are you a developer?

1. What do you do when you're reviewing a commit (deciding if it should be 
included or not)? Do you look in the source code? Do you read the commit 
message?  Is the length of this message important? Are the special tags 
(DIGEST, REVIEW, BUG...) important? Do you look at the commiter name?

2. What happens if you find too many interesting commits (above our 5% rule)?

3. What do you do if you see many commits from a single project, where you 
feel that none of them should be included separately?

4. When classifying, how do you make the difference between a feature and
a bug fix?

5. When classifying, how often do you remove commits?

6. When writing a summary, what commits you include? With long messages? From 
well-known projects? With many changes in many files? With the tags?

7. Do you want more people to include the DIGEST tag? If so, when?

8. Do you want more such special tags? Which ones?

9. Do you have other suggestions?

Thanks in advance for all input you have. It will make the presentation better 
and, I hope, improve the workflow between us and the developers.

Thanks all,
Marta