Digest 179 submitted to the Dot

[Marco Krohn]

Thanks Vlad!

About classification: it would be interesting if the wrong
classification happens in particular if a bug number is available. If
a bug number is available I open the corresponding bug report and
classify the commit accordingly (as described in the classification
guidelines http://community.kde.org/Commit_Digest/Guidelines ) and I
do not pay much attention to the commit message itself. When writing
this part of the classification guidelines I assumed that the
information in bug.kde.org can be trusted. If this is incorrect please
let me know.

Have a nice day,
  Marco



On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Vladislav Blanton <vblanton at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear team,
>
> Digest 179 has been submitted to the Dot! **applause**
>
> A couple things I have noticed:
> There has been some interesting classification of features as bugs and bugs
> as features in the last couple of digests. Please watch for this when
> classifying and remember, just because it has a bug report doesn't mean it
> is a bugfix. It could be a feature request.
>
> Aside from that, things look pretty good, however we could certainly see
> some of our more dormant classifier/reviewers jumping back in to the
> process!
>
> Vlad
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digest mailing list
> Digest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>
>