Review Request 124036: a bit more porting to writeodf
Camilla Boemann
cbr at boemann.dk
Mon Jun 8 06:49:09 BST 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124036/#review81303
-----------------------------------------------------------
I'd prefer that we don't do any kind of porting like this before 3.2
besides i would prefer no use of namespace and also that we dn't end up with a mix of two different writing frameworks in our code
That said the framework in itself looks like a good idea
- Camilla Boemann
On June 7, 2015, 6:12 p.m., Jos van den Oever wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124036/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated June 7, 2015, 6:12 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Calligra.
>
>
> Repository: calligra
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> a bit more porting to writeodf
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> filters/libodf2/KoColumn.cpp aab928a
> libs/odf/Ko3dScene.cpp 81d7c28
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124036/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> no
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jos van den Oever
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/attachments/20150608/c2c17917/attachment.htm>
More information about the calligra-devel
mailing list