Style objects for applications and filters

Inge Wallin inge at lysator.liu.se
Sun Apr 27 02:35:04 BST 2014


On Friday, April 25, 2014 12:50:15 Inge Wallin wrote:

> So here is the question: When we move forward with the docx filter, should
> we either:
> 
>  - add stream reading capabilities and maybe storage of properties
> represented as text to the objects in libs/odf
> 
> or:
> 
>  - create new objects like the previous style objects in filters/libodf2
> 
> The first one makes more sense to me since we should reduce duplication in
> Calligra at large and this will also mean that the objects will be made
> complete in relation to the attributes defined by the standard.  But it may
> also mean that not all attributes will be available in binary form through
> named class methods.

Nobody has any opinion at all? 

This is a choice that will influence a lot of code in the future.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/attachments/20140427/75d61571/attachment.htm>


More information about the calligra-devel mailing list