Style objects for applications and filters
Inge Wallin
inge at lysator.liu.se
Fri Apr 25 11:50:15 BST 2014
I would like to have the opinion of the community for a certain issue. The
first version of the docx export filter is now merged and it's time to take the
next step. But this next step involves a decision which needs the input from
the rest of the Calligra community.
The docx filter uses stream reading to parse the odf file, using
KoXmlStreamReader in filters/libodf2, as opposed to our applications that use
DOM reading, using the KoXmlReader in libs/odf.
One thing that we will need is page layout properties, which has child
elements for columns among other things and this is where decision lies. Page
layout properties already has good support in a couple of objects in libs/odf,
among them KoPageLayout, KoColumns and KoBorder.
Those objects are designed to be fast and use binary representation of their
properties. On the other hand many of them are not complete, i.e. they don't
read, store and write all the properties that are defined in the standard. And
they don't support stream reading. The style objects in filters/libodf2 are
all designed to be complete if not super fast - yet.
So here is the question: When we move forward with the docx filter, should we
either:
- add stream reading capabilities and maybe storage of properties represented
as text to the objects in libs/odf
or:
- create new objects like the previous style objects in filters/libodf2
The first one makes more sense to me since we should reduce duplication in
Calligra at large and this will also mean that the objects will be made
complete in relation to the attributes defined by the standard. But it may
also mean that not all attributes will be available in binary form through
named class methods.
Opinions?
-Inge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/attachments/20140425/c86f0c95/attachment.htm>
More information about the calligra-devel
mailing list