Rename Coffice?

[Elvis Stansvik]

2013/3/25 Sebastian Sauer <mail at dipe.org>:
> On 03/25/2013 12:32 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>>
>> hi, congrats for publicity but i'm suggesting not introducing
>> redundant brands extra that sound like a fork,
>
>
> Redundant as in Coffice contains already a C==Calligra? Yes, well. That name
> refers also to my preference for coffee & cola while hacking:
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coffice :) Also redundancy is
> something rather common in FLOSS. May it be in Calligra's code (just look my
> last review-request, but yes, its way better today then it was years ago),
> in naming (acronyms, redundancy, jokes - hello libkok :).
>
> Anyhow. If that's somehow a problem would renaming solve it? And if yes,
> what's a better name to show its just another flavor of Calligra just like
> Calligra Mobile, Documents on the N9, Calligra Active, Calligra Kids (which
> is afaik gone but well, we once had plans there with a specialized
> interface), ...
>
>
>> just writing
>> 'experimental calligra words for android' would imho say it clearly
>> what's the effort is about atm...
>
>
> hmmm... Ok, I changed the description from "alpha-version" to "experimental
> alpha-version".  Now it says "Experimental alpha version with support for
> Words only, more to come later" or so.
>
> FYI: In fact all that started with Sheets and I have a compiling and linking
> Sheets already. The reasons why I switched to Words are that a) Sheets makes
> way lesser use of calligralibs and getting calligralibs working and proper
> tested was very important cause b) Words and Stage share quit a lot of
> code/logic and so having Words done its a small(er) step to Stage. The thing
> is that I like to first focus on the foundations, that means get Words
> proper threaded, before adding more and more to the mix. That's what I will
> work on next.
>
> For the "for Android" part: That's what I wrote and what most news-articles
> took over even in there headlines, no? Anyhow, its also clear that that
> isn't 100% true cause I actually did/do most of the work on my KDE desktop,
> where the app runs and works fine too, and only test on the device from time
> to time or for things like multi-touch where desktop isn't that good.
> Probably would make sense I add it to OBS so there are packages for desktop
> Linux. Will look at it. Also its clear that BB10 and Sailfish are very much
> on top of my list. Anyhow, I think the interesting news here for now is
> indeed the "runs on Android and heer are the packages" part and that's what
> most news-articles took over. imho a good message.

Since you seem to be trying to cut down on size, perhaps Calligra Mini? :)

Elvis

>
>
>>   That's my first impression after
>> reading mislesding info on newssites...
>
>
> Not sure what's misleading or how I could address that. Its now
> "experimental Words only" (more coming later)" what imho sums it good up.
>
>
>>
>> On 25/03/2013, Sebastian Sauer <mail at dipe.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Common feedback seems to be that the application should contain the
>>> "Calligra" name to raise awareness / make our brand stronger. I tend to
>>> agree. Suggestion would be that to rename the visible parts to "Calligra
>>> Coffice". Would that be okay or anybody against or...?
>>>
>>> Also the name "Coffice" is for sure not set in stones but I can't think
>>> of a better one. If there are suggestions raise please raise them now! :)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> calligra-devel mailing list
>>> calligra-devel at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel