An other RC ?

[Cyrille Berger]

On 2013-01-11 09:53, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 11 January 2013 09:34, Cyrille Berger <cberger at cberger.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since Casper discovered some really bad bugs in calligra sheets, 
>> even though
>> they are not regressions, it still might be worth to have an extra 
>> "RC" to
>> make sure that fixing those bugs don't introduce regressions.
>
> Is the regression in some new feature or in core changes?
>
> I am asking because personally if there's regression that's 
> unsolvable
> on time I am leaning towards moving the change to version+1.
> I feel we're seriously delayed (~2 months) and thus breaking our
> commitments to release often.

They are not regressions, but are rather severe bugs in the calculation 
engine of sheets:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313010
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312981
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313056


> Actually this keeps bugfixes unreleased for a long time. May I to ask
> for another minor release for 2.5 in the meantime?
I am fine with that.

-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott