Beta 2 tagging delay

[Cyrille Berger Skott]

On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Yes, we have a branch called "master", just like we used to have a branch
> called "trunk". We don't have any other branch that is related to the
> release process. We only have feature branches.
>
> But let it go, this discussion isn't productive at all.

Yeah lets not improve our workflow...
 
> > > There's no staging branch where people can easily track all branches in
> > > one go, and that is the reason that the branches do not get sufficient
> > > testing before merging into master.
> >
> > 
> >
> > The problem of the staging branch is that noone has step forward to do
> > the  work on proposing a workflow (it is not as simple as doing "git
> > checkout -b staging" and telling people they can merge all kind of
> > branches in there.
> 
> So it isn't there, and that's why we have this current problem, for which
> we asked for a delay in tagging. I will not have time to work on the
> solution until Saturday, sorry for that.
So any objection to the revert of ef3277a2bd7dd0b9454114d1562b633dff47c86e ?

-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott