tools docker etc in plan

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Wednesday 26 January 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 14:57:07 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Dag Andersen <danders at get2net.dk> wrote:
> > > > Atm I don't have any use for the tools docker nor actually any other
> > > > docker except the Scripting docker in plan.
> > > > This *may* change in the future of course, so it would be nice to have
> > > > a way
> > > > of controlling which plugins should be loaded. AFAICS it's possible to
> > > > *disable* plugins if you know their id. I'd rather have the possibility
> > > > to *enable* those I use and have everything else disabled.
> > > > Anybody knows how this could most easily be achived?
> > > 
> > > Have a look at KoToolRegistry there is a whitelist and a blacklist. I
> > > think that should solve it.
> > 
> > Well the problem is that by default, a plugin that is neither on the
> > whitelist nor on the blacklist will be added to the whitelist.
> > 
> > But yes plugins enabling is something that we should talk at the next
> > sprint:
> > 
> > http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Meetings/Begin_2011_meeting/Ideas#Plugins
> 
> Would it be enough for a GSOC project to create a plugin manager that a user 
> can use? If not maybe we should put it on a list of stuff as Junjor Job.

A plugin manager like for instance kdevelop has is hardly a gsoc project -- it shouldn't be more than a week or so of work.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org