2.4 Release Plan

[Cyrille Berger Skott]

On Thursday 13 January 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> Now, if we instead prolong the initial release phase to, say, 7 months and
> by  doing that make sure that the release is in fact good enough then the
> user gets a usable Calligra in 7 months.
Really, you think one extra month will be enough ? If that is the case, then I 
agree. But I am very skeptical. But ok since we are aiming at a release around 
May - June. I suggest people to fill the feature plan [1], with the mention 
"URRF - 3 weeks" (User Readiness Required Feature) if you think that is a 
feature that needs to be finished for the application to be user ready, and 
that you would need 3 weeks to complete it, and by 3 weeks I mean real time, 
meaning that if it is a feature that require 30h of work, and you can work 10h 
per week-end on calligra, it translates to 3 weeks.

So fill [1] as soon as possible, I would set the deadline for February, 2nd 
(which would be equivalent to a soft-freeze, meaning that afterwards 
development, in master, should be focused on the content of the features 
plan).

And then we can see if we need 3, 4, or 8 month of features development.

[1] http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.4/Feature_Plan
-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott