release schedule proposal

[Cyrille Berger Skott]

On Wednesday 02 February 2011, todd rme wrote:
> That is fine once we have an initial "main" release, but in my opinion
> you made a clear commitment to support koffice 2.3 until then.  I
> think abandoning koffice 2.3 now would be a P.R. disaster.  First, it
> could easily be portrayed as spiteful and petty (I know it isn't, but
> if you follow discussions online you know people will make up their
> own motivations for these things).  Second, it doesn't seem very
> professional, which is exactly what business users are looking for.
> Third, it would cast doubt on future support for calligra releases.
In any case there will be a koffice 2.3.2. If only for the fixes that were 
allready commited. However, it won't be announced officially on koffice.org, 
not because we don't want, but because we can't.

-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott