Approach for port to KF5

[Andrew Lake]

Ok, I went ahead and updated the project site. I've been looking for a way
to change the reviewboard group mailing list but I couldn't find it. I'll
submit a sysadmin ticket.

Andrew

On Mon Nov 03 2014 at 7:09:09 AM Eshton Robateau <2607922181 at qq.com> wrote:

> Looks great so far. I think Andrew has the admin rights to the website and
> reviewboard so he should be able to handle that.
> Also remember to CC bangarang at kde.org so message goes to mailing list.
>
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> *From: * "Stefan Burnicki";<stefan.burnicki at burnicki.net>;
> *Date: * Nov 3, 2014
> *To: * "Eshton Robateau"<2607922181 at qq.com>;
> *Subject: * Re: Approach for port to KF5
>
> Am 01.11.2014 um 02:50 schrieb Eshton Robateau:
>
> > I'm on board with the new directory/branch approach. Although I don't
> > have much experience with QML, I prefer the idea of exporting
> > MediaItemModel (and any other needed models)  as a extension, it would
> > allow a more dynamic approach to be taken in the UI designs.
> > In terms of porting classes, it makes better sense to start from the
> > lowest level of the architecture (i.e the listengine hierarchy) before
> > porting other classes. This would allow us to see how much of the
> > above architecture needs serious redesign or rewriting.  Logically,
> > next would be MediaItemModel and any other models, followed by the
> > playlist class; the infofetchers, search infrastructure and storage
> > are details that cannot be tackled until a minimal port is in place.
> >
>
> This seems reasonable to me. Maybe I will think about the architecture
> and do a little graph/chart for us to agree on.
>
> >
> > ------------------ Original ------------------
> > *From: * "Andrew Lake";<jamboarder at gmail.com>;
> > *Send time:* Saturday, Nov 1, 2014 0:57 AM
> > *To:* "Stefan Burnicki"<stefan.burnicki at burnicki.net>;
> > "bangarang"<bangarang at kde.org>;
> > *Subject: * Re: Approach for port to KF5
>
> >
> > Start with the platform stuff and write unit tests as we go. Stefan
> > would you be willing to take the KF5 branch and set it up to start
> > clean like you described?
> Online in the review board. We should change that the review EMail
> doesn't get send to the old googlegroups mailing list, but to the new
> one instead.
> You will find only a minimal main.cpp for now,probably with outdated
> KAboutData, just needed something to test the new CMake build stuff.
>
> Also, we need to update the project site, since the "post-review" tool
> is obsolete and replaced by "rbt post", but I don't think I have
> privilege to do so.
> _______________________________________________
> Bangarang mailing list
> Bangarang at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/bangarang
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/bangarang/attachments/20141103/5a7f1eaf/attachment.html>