[LikeBack: Dislike] #464 (2.3-GIT - de)

[eqisow]

I think in foobar and some other programs they're called plug-ins. Just
another option. Probably even more standard than 'add-on'.

Of course, script has been the standard in amarok for awhile. There's
something to be said about not changing conventions without good reason.

Is this a good reason? I don't know.

I agree that 'internet' is a bad place for the menu option though.

On Jul 2, 2010 8:04 PM, "Valorie Zimmerman" <valorie.zimmerman at gmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:50 AM,  <andyjoerg at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://likeback.kollide.net/admin/view.php
>
> Version: 2.3-GIT
> Locale:  de
> Window:  MainWindow -> ScriptManager
> Context:
> Type:    Dislike
> Comment:
> please make the handling of scripts easier for people. e.i. don't call
> them scrips call them add-ons like in firefox. addons are more
> understood then scrips by non geeks.
> you could add the 'add script' or addons button directily in to the
> 'Internet' section. may be as a little green symbol.
>
> thanks!! you do great work!!
> andi

Andi, I'll bring your first point to the list for discussion. I think
you are right that "script", although technically the most correct
term, is possibly geeky and off-putting.

However, the Internet Services doesn't sound like a good place for
scripts/addons/plugins. All of our Internet Services are places where
music or other sound files can be found.

What do you say, developers?

All the best,

Valorie
--
New! http://genealogy-uki.linkpendium.com/
Facebook, Twitter, Identi.ca, LinkedIn, Delicious: valoriez .
All my pages: http://valorie.zimmerman.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________
Amarok mailing list
Amarok at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20100702/036fada6/attachment.html>