Elegance -- some suggestions for amarok first run

[Jeff Mitchell]

On 8/2/2010 12:16 PM, Kevin Funk wrote:
>> Just
>> browsing my kwallet, it looks like Amarok is the only one to store the
>> username there. (It looks like Kopete, Choqok, KMail, and Subversion
>> all only store the passwords, but I'm not 100% on that.) Either of
>> your proposed options would probably work, but unless there's some
>> very good reason to store the username in the wallet too, I think
>> having the username in the amarokrc would probably work out pretty
>> well.
> 
> I'd rather just put some boolean value (LastFmLoginProvided) in the rc and 
> then validate the wallet credentials.

I generally agree with Kevin here. Although usernames are generally not
considered a "big deal" to have out in the open, they are still PII, and
some people may really prefer having it in the wallet.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20100802/d2d6b47a/attachment.sig>