2.1 SVN as of 5/9/09 Collection scan stuck at 99%

Ben K mrmrpotatohead at gmail.com
Sun May 10 23:57:19 UTC 2009


Are you in a postition to run Ampache on the rackmount? Might be an improved
experience compared to NFS, and the new Collections approach treats it just
the same as a local collection.

Does anyone have any experience with this and would/wouldn't recommend
switching?

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Dr. Diesel <dr.diesel at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Jeff Mitchell <mitchell at kde.org> wrote:
>
>> Dr. Diesel wrote:
>> > Ok, that figures, just after I send that it finishes!  No debug output
>> > as to why it took so long or what it was busy processing.
>>
>> ...150k files over NFS?
>>
>
> Yeah, mounted from a rackmount server until somebody comes out with 4TB
> laptop HD!
>
> My bad, Amarok 1.4x could scan the collection in 4-5 hours, 2.1 beta took
> about 35 hours, 4-5 of which it was stuck on 99%!  Guess I jumped the gun.
>
>
> --
> projecthuh.com
> All of my bits are free, are yours?  Fedoraproject.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20090511/7b2df1a9/attachment.html>


More information about the Amarok mailing list