amarok 1.4

[Jeff Mitchell]

Ralf Jung wrote:
> From my experience with bugzilla I expected that if this is the case, the bug 
> was closed as duplicate, not as invalid. However if you are indeed aware of 
> the problem, and just want to keep the number of open bugs small, I'm happy, 
> too :D

DUPLICATE requires remembering which other bug number is the duplicate :-)

> Since you say bringing the old playlist back is too much work currently (so 
> far, I always heard you won't do this as there is no need, which is a subtle 
> difference to not dong it because of a lack of time :) )

I didn't say that it isn't being brought back because of a lack of time.
I said that currently we want to focus on other things. That doesn't
mean that given time, it'd be brought back.

> I would also prefer it if the new playlist could somehow be made as flexible as 
> the old one without taking away what makes it better than the old one. Some 
> suggestions come to my mind which in that regard, I'll write them down here 
> because I am just thinking about this topic - I can make wish-reports if you 
> want me to:

<snip>

Thanks for the suggestions! I would definitely file them as wishlist bugs.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20090718/1f26d004/attachment.sig>