MySQL Embedded status

[Dr. Diesel]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Mark Kretschmann <kretschmann at kde.org>wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Dr. Diesel <dr.diesel at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Big O <illogical1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu> wrote:
> >> >> So as I'm sure some of you know, we've been having problems with
> MySQL
> >> >> in Amarok trunk. Thanks to a patch from the Debian maintainer, it
> >> >> looks like things are in good shape now though.
> >> >>
> >> >> Compiling Amarok with MySQL is still difficult; see the other thread
> >> >> if you have trouble there.
> >> >>
> >> >> However if you've successfully built Amarok trunk and have trouble
> >> >> running Amarok or building its collection, we want to know about it.
> A
> >> >> couple of days ago that describes about half of everyone easily. But
> >> >> now your a unique butterfly and we need to know about the issue so we
> >> >> can have a smooth beta2 release.
> >> > Does "slow" collection building count? And by "slow" I mean the exact
> >> > same speed as with the previous database backend. There's only 10GB of
> >> > files being indexed.
> >>
> >> 10 gb is pretty small. I don't think anyone was saying small
> >> collection users would notice a speed up.
> >>
> >> Ian
> >
> > Planning to test my slightly > than 1TB collection once this bug is
> > resolved/worked around.
> >
> > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171443
>
> You might have to wait a very long time for that, unless you actually
> tell us what the heck needs to be patched. The whole report has
> "fuzzy" written all over it.
>
> You keep referring to something that Scott Wheeler allegedly fixed in
> Amarok 1, but where is that patch?
>

Your the programmer, ask the correct questions..  I faithfully report
crashing only to further support/help and make Amarok better.   I answered
each and every response in the bug report and will continue to help in any
manor.  I am not a C programmer and it is not always obvious to me what else
to provide.  You have to help me help you, and I'm happy to do it!!  My
collection size has discovered many bugs in the past and now that Amarok 2.0
has evolved to this state I was hoping to once again contribute in that
fasion!

Thanks
Andy



-- 
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours?  Fedoraproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20080930/d650160e/attachment.html>