The fix for 100% CPU while searching in Collection Browser

[Dr. Diesel]

Technically the addition of album in the join is probably more
correct.  But at this stage of development simply adding DISTINCT is a
quick and safe fix until 2.0 rolls out.

But I'm game for either!

Andy

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Colin Guthrie <gmane at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
> Dr. Diesel wrote:
> > Thanks Seb.  -u didn't work:
> >
> > Subcommand 'diff' doesn't accept option '-u [--show-updates]'
> > Type 'svn help diff' for usage.
>
> svn should default to -u, I think Seb was trying to combine two bits of
> advice in one... use diff -u if you are not using svn or svn diff.
>
> You can use svn diff --diff-cmd=diff -x -u bit it's a bit of a mouthfull
> (espeically as Unified diffs are the default for svn ;))
>
> Anyway, is it worth including the album in the join as discussed in
> previous posts? It's not essential but it does cut down the results
> prior to the DISTINCTification so I'd imagine it's more efficient (tho'
> I've not done any analysis).
>
> Col
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
>



-- 
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours?  Fedoraproject.org