"dual booting" Amarok 2.0 (Windows / Linux)

[enaut]

Shane King schrieb:
> Shane King wrote:
>   
>> Ian Monroe wrote:
>>     
>>> On Jan 11, 2008 9:13 AM, Holger <myth at finch.de> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> I already use shared data/configuration for at least half a dozen other
>>>> programs and it usually works fine :-)
>>>>
>>>> What does everybody else think?
>>>>         
>>> Those other programs aren't keeping track of files then I suppose.
>>> Since Amarok stores path information of music in the colleciton, and
>>> paths are going to differ between Windows and Linux, sharing an Amarok
>>> database between two computers or two operating systems doesn't happen
>>> for "free." Someone will have to work at it to make it function
>>> correctly.
>>>       
>> I think it could be made to work if we treated collection folders the 
>> same way we do media devices, and stored relative paths against the 
>> collection folder (since the paths of the collection folders are stored 
>> in the config file, not the db).
>>
>> Then again, I don't really get the need for it: the collection db is 
>> just a cache of info in the file tags. Scanning twice isn't that much of 
>> a pain, is it?
>>     
>
> To answer my own question ... I guess some people care about the stats. 
> Last.fm is the solution to that IMO. They even do backups for you. ;)
>
> Shane.
last fm... well last fm is good as long as I'm 100% sure they don't use 
my data. And the data is locked up for erverybody else... but maybe I 
want to know my statistics without uploading them to somebody I i cant 
really trust because even if they don't use my data its such a lot of 
valueable Data that could be hacked easyly... I just don't like the idea 
of storing such data in the net.

enaut
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20080112/78ca7ca0/attachment.html>