not less than

[Ian Monroe]

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Walter Little <walterplittle at gmail.com>
wrote:

> It's not so much a matter of the precision, as one can easily adjust their
> criteria by one integer (i.e. score>=90 can be score>89). In fact, that is
> how I would define it anyway, as that is how I think about such things.
> However, I can also see how some users would find it more intuitive to use
> greater than or equal to. That is the basis toward my saying it would be
> nice to have - solely on the merits of being intuitive for the largest
> number of people possible (within, of course, reasonable bounds). With
> regards to the original poster's point, we could even have a "not" checkbox
> in front of the condition, as that might be intuitive for some people.
> Beyond those sorts of things, however, I wouldn't suggest making it
> encapsulate too many possibilities as it would become less useful by virtue
> of having *too* many options.
>
> -wpl


Well that's my point, who cares if the cut-off is 91 or 90.

Ian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20080423/91434d91/attachment.html>