not less than

[Caleb Cushing]

On Wednesday 23 April 2008 03:27:36 pm Ian Monroe wrote:
> I really don't understand. Get out your truth tables. If a and b are
> integers from 0 to 100, !(a>b) is the same as a<=b

you're right except for the part where you say get out your truth tables.

the work around works I just didn't get it the first time.

The problem is the lack of the extra logic. Having more options isn't 
confusing in this case as why do I have to say greater than when I mean not 
less than.

basically I want the operators to work in the way I'm thinking. Without having 
to think about 'truth tables'. Even if the way I'm thinking is somewhat 
skewed. It's more about usability (and the fact that I don't always think in 
truth tables) than being able to do it.

also the sql should be something like.  where not (value < ...). etc
-- 
Caleb Cushing

my blog http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20080423/d31a2748/attachment.sig>