not less than

[Ian Monroe]

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2008 01:29:48 pm Walter Little wrote:
>  > Since what you are asking for is essentially "greater than or equal to" and
>
>  yes but I'm using it for excludes in match all. and what you are saying
>  doesn't really work. plus for greater than or equal to you can generally just
>  use the next lower number.
>
>  The problem is none of these match NOT. I can only do NOT equal to.
>
>  sure I could put multiple NOT equal to's in until it's supported...
>
>  but basically my problem is partially caused by match any.
>
>  because I tell it to match any score higher than 70 or any rating higher than
>  2.5 or anything not played.
>
>  well the problem comes in when I rate a song 2 but it's score is 75. I don't
>  want it to play... I've currently got a rule that says and not equal to
>  rating1 to exclude things I've specifically rated low.
>
>  but really doing that is just a nasty hack based on a limited system.
>

I really don't understand. Get out your truth tables. If a and b are
integers from 0 to 100, !(a>b) is the same as a<=b

Ian