[Feedback] MOG.com

[joysn at gmx.net]

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:22:29PM -0600, Ian Monroe wrote:
> On 3/9/07, joysn at gmx.net <joysn at gmx.net> wrote:
> >
> > why mog.com? there is support for last.fm, and it is not bad...
> > is there something mog.com does better than last.fm?
> 
> Between having their slogan be "BECAUSE THE WEB MOSTLY SUCKS", being
> in beta, and using the word "MOG-O-SPHERE", they are apparently far
> more web 2.0 pretentious.

i dont know how the integration of amarok and last.fm work, but from
that view, how could amarok benefit from the web 2.0 stuff mod.com does?
i think web 2.0 aims to enhance the user experience of a web application
using plain old browsers. would it be easier for amarok to parse async
xml results of mod.com if there are such responses?

cheers...