Fullscreen-Interface and Amarok 2.0

[Jan Zarnikov]

I think you got the point. The firefox extension dialog looks much
better and seems easier to use. IT DOESN'T MATTER WETHER IT REALLY IS
EASIER. Just because the dialog looks a bit difficult disencourages
the users.
Also in firefox the awareness that the are extensions and what they
can do is much bigger than among the amarok users.
The script functionalily in amarok is great and has a big potential.
It just needs to be solled better.

I like the idea of addons in firefox 2.0 - make skins and extensions
available at one place. This encourages the user to personalize theire
browser. I think amarok could learn alot from this.

>
> I guess we'll have to disagree here, because I think the script dialogue is
> quite easy.  In Firefox, you have a single list of extensions -- in Amarok,
> they're grouped by category.  In Firefox, you click the link to add
> extensions and you have to browse the web -- in Amarok, it's an integrated
> dialogue.  Both have buttons right there to enable/disable scripts, configure
> scripts, etc.  I don't really understand why Firefox's dialogue is so much
> easier, although I will admit it looks prettier.
>
> --Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
>