Amarok2 vs Amarok 2

[Ljubomir Simin]

On Jan 23, 2008 9:01 AM, Harald Sitter <sitter.harald at gmail.com> wrote:
> Side note: official publications always used Amarok 2, will always use
> Amarok 2, just like KDE 4... FoobarN just ain't professional...
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 1:35 AM, Aaron Krill <corporeal at infinitephilosopher.com> wrote:
> > Amarok 2, as in Amarok 2.0. Amarok2 sounds more like some sort of
> > sequel/derivative, as opposed to a new major release.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/22/08, Mark Kretschmann < kretschmann at kde.org> wrote:
> > > Heya,
> > >
> > > this might not be the most important issue ever, but I see myself
> > > constantly switching between these two notations, and I can't decide
> > > what's better:
> > >
> > > Amarok2 or Amarok 2
> > >
> > > Personally I tend towards "Amarok 2" now, although initially I've
> > > preferred "Amarok2". I think it would help towards a corporate
> > > identity if we could decide for one of these options.
> > >
> > >
> > > Opinions?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Amarok-promo mailing list
> > > Amarok-promo at kde.org
> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-promo
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amarok-promo mailing list
> > Amarok-promo at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-promo
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-promo mailing list
> Amarok-promo at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-promo
>

I agree with all previously said.

-- 
Ljubomir Simin
Registered Linux User #351181
http://counter.li.org