Amarok2 vs Amarok 2

[Harald Sitter]

Side note: official publications always used Amarok 2, will always use
Amarok 2, just like KDE 4... FoobarN just ain't professional...

On Jan 23, 2008 1:35 AM, Aaron Krill <corporeal at infinitephilosopher.com> wrote:
> Amarok 2, as in Amarok 2.0. Amarok2 sounds more like some sort of
> sequel/derivative, as opposed to a new major release.
>
>
>
> On 1/22/08, Mark Kretschmann < kretschmann at kde.org> wrote:
> > Heya,
> >
> > this might not be the most important issue ever, but I see myself
> > constantly switching between these two notations, and I can't decide
> > what's better:
> >
> > Amarok2 or Amarok 2
> >
> > Personally I tend towards "Amarok 2" now, although initially I've
> > preferred "Amarok2". I think it would help towards a corporate
> > identity if we could decide for one of these options.
> >
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > --
> > Mark
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amarok-promo mailing list
> > Amarok-promo at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-promo
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-promo mailing list
> Amarok-promo at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-promo
>
>