New taglib v1.10

[Michael Palimaka]

On 17/04/16 02:46, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Michael Palimaka <kensington at gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On 16/04/16 20:26, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensington at gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build against it because they do a
>>>> string comparison on the version (STRLESS vs VERSION_LESS) so 1.10
>>>> appears too old, but it's an easy fix.
>>>
>>> Strange, as that particular comparison is in the
>>> FindTaglib-Extras.cmake only, so it should not cause problems with
>>> taglib itself.
>>
>> Right, there's no problem with taglib itself. It's just a heads up that
>> some revdeps have faulty version detection logic and fail to find 1.10.
> 
> Does that mean that these lines in FindTaglib.cmake are causing a
> problem to find version 1.10?
> 
> if(NOT TAGLIB_MIN_VERSION)
>   set(TAGLIB_MIN_VERSION "1.6")
> endif(NOT TAGLIB_MIN_VERSION)
> 
> 
> Regards, Myriam
> 

See this fix that was applied for kdelibs:
https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kdelibs.git&a=commitdiff&h=967fc70300d5c2ae34d39b61757b717f6fca8805

Some packages (such as taglib-extras-1.0.1 and amarok-2.8.0) ship their
own FindTaglib.cmake that does not contain this fix. Since 1.6 > 1.10
lexicographically, these unpatched packages will fail to find taglib-1.10.