Review Request: TrackProvider non virtual functions implemented for Nepomuk Collection

[Phalgun Guduthur]

> On Nov. 6, 2012, 3:58 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCollection.cpp, line 117
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107161/diff/1/?file=93131#file93131line117>
> >
> >     In the Nepomuk code I generally prefer a 'using namespace Nepomuk::Vocabulary' at the top.
> >     
> >     This however is not Nepomuk code, so it's your choice :)

I am using Nepomuk::Vocabulary only once in the whole file. Thought it would be wasteful to use the namespace. 


- Phalgun


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107161/#review21472
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 9, 2012, 2:24 p.m., Phalgun Guduthur wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107161/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 9, 2012, 2:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok, Edward Hades Toroshchin and Vishesh Handa.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> First footstep in completing the Nepomuk Collection. 
> 
> The non virtual methods belonging to TrackProvider implemented.
> Repeated documentation to help vHanda understand the purpose of those functions. 
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCollection.h d920ff6 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCollection.cpp 0593697 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107161/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Minimal.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Phalgun Guduthur
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20121109/607e03fb/attachment-0001.html>