GSoC 2012 : Improvised proposal for 'Semantic Collection for Amarok'

[Teo Mrnjavac]

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 16:03, Phalgun Guduthur
<phalgun.guduthur at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Teo Mrnjavac <teo at kde.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 18:25, Phalgun Guduthur
>> <phalgun.guduthur at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello
>> >
>> > I have been working towards the 2012 GSoC idea 'Semantic Collection for
>> > Amarok' since a month now. I have already sent in my first rough draft
>> > of
>> > the proposal.
>> >
>> > At that time, I promised a proof of Concept and you can it submitted on
>> > the
>> > review board https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104369/
>> >
>> > It is a small patch demonstrating the read and write of Nepomuk index
>> > through Amarok.
>> >
>> > I have also attached my improvised proposal after interactions with both
>> > the
>> > mentors Teo and Vishesh.
>> >
>> > Please review my proposal whenever you find time. Any feedback is
>> > appreciated.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Phalgun
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> When I read "Improvised" I was a bit worried for a moment ;)
>> Overall the proposal is pretty good. I'd still like it if you could
>> think about the timeline a bit more. I'm not sure you can complete the
>> NepomukCollection before the NepomukQueryMaker. A bit more clarity in
>> the timeline could go a long way in convincing the team that you
>> understand the problem thoroughly.
>>
>> The proof of concept looks good, simple and to the point.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Teo
>
>
> Well, there were a few additions in the proposal, hence 'improvised' ;)
>
> Just two questions,
>
> 1) Is my timeline good w.r.t granularity? Should I be more specific. I'm
> already worried that my proposal is lengthy.
>
> 2) Can you please be a little more elaborate on why NepomukCollection it
> can't be completed before NepomukQueryMaker?


The NepomukCollection isn't very useful by itself without a
QueryMaker. Of course you can do one and then the other but I figure
it would be much easier to test if you do it at the same time. This
was pretty much my only concern.

Cheers,
-- 
Teo