GSoC update from Riccardo - his KMail is b0rked again

[Bart Cerneels]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Matěj Laitl <matej at laitl.cz> wrote:
> On 20. 8. 2012 Teo Mrnjavac wrote:
>> http://wstaw.org/m/2012/08/20/plasma-desktopAH1228.png
>
> Good progress, but again I have to repeat myself: I will oppose merging any
> rewrite that will introduce significant feature-loss regressions. Sorry.
>
> Such code should live in a branch until it has general feature parity (in this
> case: functionality of all meaningful applets that work reliably currently
> should be provided by the new CV: wikipedia, labels, lyrics, similar artists,
> tabs, events, photos...), as for example my iPod Collection rewrite did. Note
> that code living in a branch isn't something bad, it receives proper testing
> and review from interested parties (e.g. me), but we shouldn't disappoint
> uninterested parties with regressions.
>
> Teo, please forward this mail to Riccardo if he cannot read the list. (even if
> your opinion is different, this is just a notice of my point of view)
>
> Cheers and keep up the good work,
>                 Matěj

I second that.