Review Request: Extend the scope of the playground

[Ralf Engels]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103999/#review17514
-----------------------------------------------------------


Personally I don't see the reason for a playground.
If somebody want's to play around we can do a branch on the kde git server, a WIP review request or something else.
The "playground" stuff is unmaintained since years.

- Ralf Engels


On Feb. 17, 2012, 2:53 a.m., Ryan McCoskrie wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103999/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 17, 2012, 2:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is infrastructure for future patches of mine. It's intended to (after some revising) make it relatively easy to develop code that is (mostly) in the playground directory but is (by necessity) compiled into the player binary.
> 
> Note: I'm only looking for criticism and have no intention of seeing this shipped.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt d47c28b 
>   playground/CMakeLists.txt e96aa3f 
>   playground/src/CMakeLists.txt ed740ec 
>   src/App.cpp 2f1837c 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 4241e69 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103999/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Checked that the code compiles.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ryan McCoskrie
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20120816/1786faa5/attachment.html>