Review Request: Add new collection filter to find exact matches
Matěj Laitl
matej at laitl.cz
Mon Oct 24 19:56:26 UTC 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102252/#review7586
-----------------------------------------------------------
I like the feature, but the syntax seems little incoherent wrt current one, specifically the greater-than and smaller-than variants e.g. playcount:<3 or track:>10. I know these are numeric values, but being coherent counts. What about field:=value? (I must admit it looks a bit weird, let's see what others will say)
Please do the gui (this has additional benefit of telling user that artist:something is a "contains" match) and I'll be happy to merge this once other Amarok devs agree.
- Matěj Laitl
On Aug. 8, 2011, 2:38 p.m., Daniel Faust wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102252/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Aug. 8, 2011, 2:38 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Amarok.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Since I use labels quite intensive it sometimes comes handy to search for songs with an exact label, not just a label containing the string I'm searching for.
> So I added a new filter type for this and used the '=' sign.
>
> Searching for label=pop finds songs labeled with 'pop' but not with 'electro pop'.
> While searching for label:pop finds songs labeled with 'pop' and 'electro pop'.
>
> This is not integrated into the GUI like the EditFilterDialog since I wanted to hear your opinions first.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/core-impl/collections/support/Expression.h 1e49f45
> src/core-impl/collections/support/Expression.cpp 531850a
> src/core-impl/collections/support/TextualQueryFilter.cpp 735772b
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102252/diff/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> I'm using this patch for a few weeks now without any problems.
>
>
> Screenshots
> -----------
>
>
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102252/s/221/
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel Faust
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20111024/5168533e/attachment.html>
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list