Should we support building utilities without building player?

["Paweł Hajdan, Jr."]

On 12/19/11 12:15 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
> I can do the b), but is there an actual use-case for building only utilities? 
> Would linking to kdelibs hamper this use-case? (Paweł, Thomas?)

The use case is that arch testers/developers test with various USE flag
combinations, and we're pretty good at detecting the breaking ones.

I tested with USE="-player" only because it was possible. I'm totally
fine with removing that USE flag.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20111219/0075ee7c/attachment.sig>