Should we support building utilities without building player?

[Stefan Derkits]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 12/19/2011 12:15 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
> I can do the b), but is there an actual use-case for building only
> utilities? Would linking to kdelibs hamper this use-case? (Paweł,
> Thomas?)

one use-case is/was to install a utillities package on a server
(without KDE/kdelibs installed), create (takes less time than via e.g.
NFS) a file with collection information via the collectionscanner
executable and import this file on your desktop.

No idea if many people use this anymore ... I used it from time to time.

Stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk7udSwACgkQlZvAMV/NgGKlLQCeL7JuBgC5dajWhyWuyQUgSXDP
r78An1F/Ofo/pHVNLtEqKFMmA3T7f+8o
=O7AI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----