[Amarok] b0503f5 Move Playlists back into Meta.

[Jeff Mitchell]

On 03/28/2010 01:21 PM, Nikolaj Hald Nielsen wrote:
>> I'm sure there are more arguments to be made, but the biggest one is
>> more abstract:
>> Playlists should not be treated as a second class citizen in Amarok by
>> keeping them out of the true hard of amarok's core: Meta and
>> Collection. It's as much a technical issue: Playlists not supported by
>> QueryMaker; as a social one: new collection implementations (MD)
>> lacking a decent PlaylistProvider.
> 
> I have not been a part of the recent version of this discussion and I
> am not sure I really want to get involved (as I dont have a strong
> opinion either way), but I do have one question. Is there a particular
> reason why playlists should not be able to do proper synchronization
> and so on without being part of the Meta namespace?

None at all.

> As for the "true [heart] of amaroks core", I surely see playlists as a
> part of this, even if they have their own namespace.

Right. In fact, I would claim that all of the top-level namespaces are
parts of the core of Amarok. Which is also why they're in core/ ...

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20100328/431c672f/attachment.sig