The unit tests architecture

[Nathan Sala]

2010/1/31 Ian Monroe <ian.monroe at gmail.com>

> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Nathan Sala <sala.nathan at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thank you Leo,
> >
> > This code is really helpful for us!
> >
> > Anyway, are some people willing to comment a global unit tests
> > system refactoring in Amarok?
> >
>
> What do you mean?
>
> The unit test code is currently quite broken, it doesn't even compile
> under linux. :/ But I'm not sure it needs a 'refactor'... it just
> needs to be fixed and have tests added to it.
>

What do you mean "broken"? I can compile and run unit tests under Linux.

The system  has recently been sensibly improved by Rick W. Chen,
but it is still quite primitive. Create a test requires to modify several
files,
one of which is App.cpp in several portions of code. Maybe he could share
his point of view?

QTestLib is a convenient framework we could totally use.
One other idea is to make automatic the execution of the html generator.


> Ian
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20100131/3c426243/attachment.htm