Proposal: A series of time based releases for 2.2.x

Mark Kretschmann kretschmann at kde.org
Sun Sep 27 13:14:44 CEST 2009


On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Mark Kretschmann <kretschmann at kde.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Lydia Pintscher <lydia at kde.org> wrote:
>> Sounds good to me. But I am leaning towards 1,5 monthly releases to
>> get in enough fixes to really make it worth updating.
>> So we would have 2 weeks for string changes and small new features and
>> 4 weeks fixing bugs.
>
> Yeah, fine with me too. It's pretty much what I had proposed on IRC a
> while ago: turning 2.2.x into a longer lasting series. So I'm all for
> it. The exact length of the cycle is something we could still figure
> out on the go, it's not so important to me currently.
>
> I have one addition though: It would be nice to pick one codename for
> the whole 2.2.x series, instead of using a new name for each sub
> release. Just like we did with 1.3.x ("Airborne") and 1.4.x ("Fast
> Forward").
>
> PS:
> Git probably makes this style of working easier than SVN. E.g. we are
> now able to cherry-pick specific features from other branches, and do
> other

Erm. GMail acted up a bit on me. But you get the gist.

-- 
Mark Kretschmann
Amarok Developer
www.kde.org - amarok.kde.org


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list