[Bug 195013] flat-view flat view collection

[Bart Cerneels]

A flat view, or rather an iTunes like 3 panel browser, is a feature
request from my girlfriend. I only thought it would be difficult
because I'm unfamiliar with QueryMaker and the way it interacts with
QAbstractItemModel.

It's sort of a feature I would do if no one else does and I happen to
have some time.
Obviously, that last one is unlikely so I was happy to read in the bug
report Maxx was working on it. But I think the all-collection and a
different browsing mode were mixed up.

Bart

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:15, Myriam Schweingruber
<schweingruber at pharma-traduction.ch> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Maximilian Kossick <maximilian.kossick at googlemail.com>
> Date: Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:37
> Subject: [Bug 195013] flat-view flat view collection
> To: amarok-bugs-dist at kde.org
>
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195013
>
>
> Maximilian Kossick <maximilian.kossick at googlemail.com> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 CC|maximilian.kossick at googlema |
>                   |il.com                      |
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from Maximilian Kossick <maximilian kossick googlemail
> com>  2009-10-29 10:37:02 ---
> Huh? Nobody is working on that in 2.2 as ar as I know. Should be relatively
> simple to implement though, it's simply a table view which shows one track per
> row. I'm not quite sure why Bart thinks that it's hard to do.
>
> If nobody works on it, then I really wonder why there is a "Toggle
> Flat View button in Amarok 2.2. This is BTW also associated to another
> bug:
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206445
>
> Any input on this would be welcome. If there is a FlatView button and
> it only crashes, then we should disable this IMHO, since nobody works
> on it.
>
>
> Regards, Myriam
>
>
> PS. Maximilian, if you don't want me to subscribe you to bugs, just
> say it, you wouldn't be the only one. But till now it has been quite
> efficient to subscribe devs to the bugs related to their field of
> work, since those don't get forgotten anymore. And there were a lot of
> forgotten bugs when I started triaging...
>
>
> --
> Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE:
> http://www.fsfe.org
> Please don't send me proprietary file formats,
> use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300)
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>