I need *your* benchmarking help!
Jeff Mitchell
mitchell at kde.org
Sun Oct 25 23:22:05 CET 2009
Alex Merry wrote:
> On Friday 23 October 2009 03:37:57 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>> If you'd like to help out -- and please, do help out -- you'll need a a
>> large enough collection that a normal full scan takes a noticeable
>> amount of time, and you'll need to be running Amarok built from Git.
>
> Well, my results are that the part of the scan where the progress bar is
> moving takes about the same amount of time (20s) for each version.
>
> However, in master there is an extra 20s wait where the progress bar appears
> sitting at some value like 100% or 98% (or 14% in the case where I cancelled a
> job at about that point immediately before the scan). This wait does not
> happen in your branch, but that might have something to do with the fact that
> the local collection claims to have 0 tracks (both before and after scanning)
> in that branch.
Ummm...it does? With current build? What does your debug output say?
--Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20091025/42962284/attachment.sig
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list