I need *your* benchmarking help!

[Alex Merry]

On Friday 23 October 2009 03:37:57 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> If you'd like to help out -- and please, do help out -- you'll need a a
> large enough collection that a normal full scan takes a noticeable
> amount of time, and you'll need to be running Amarok built from Git.

Well, my results are that the part of the scan where the progress bar is 
moving takes about the same amount of time (20s) for each version.

However, in master there is an extra 20s wait where the progress bar appears 
sitting at some value like 100% or 98% (or 14% in the case where I cancelled a 
job at about that point immediately before the scan).  This wait does not 
happen in your branch, but that might have something to do with the fact that 
the local collection claims to have 0 tracks (both before and after scanning) 
in that branch.

Alex



-- 
Why have I got six monitors?  Because I haven't got room for eight.
  -- Terry Pratchett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20091025/cd52c30e/attachment.sig