2.1.0 release plan proposal

[Lydia Pintscher]

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 16:14, Orville Bennett <illogical1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> No my point was that if we say get two or three patches backported
>> (looking at 2.0.2 we get five maximum) it is hardly worth the hassle
>> doing a release. It costs me and everyone who helps me quite a lot of
>> time.
> I see what you're saying, but if these patches are important enough to
> send off to packagers (who will release them), doesn't that implicitly
> make then important enough to make a release from?

Not necessarily no.
If it is a critical fix I will of course do a 2.0.3. But if there are
no critical fixes I am not going to do it. If someone else wants to
please say so.
Sending 2 or 3 non-critical but very-nice-to-have patches to the
packagers would be a service and no-one would be obliged to actually
package them.


Cheers
Lydia

-- 
Lydia Pintscher
Amarok community manager
kde.org - amarok.kde.org - kubuntu.org
claimid.com/nightrose