RFC: Remove or keep the "beta" label for Win/Mac?

[Leo Franchi]

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Orville Bennett <illogical1 at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Nikolaj Hald Nielsen wrote:
>
> >> I like dropping the 2 with Amarok 2.2 idea.
> >
> > +1
> Fourthed.
>
> As for Amarok on the Mac: looks bad, works (relatively) well. Yeah.
> Keep the beta.
>
> Wordier version:
> I'd like to see the beta label go because Amarok actually works quite
> well. However, a big part of the whole OS X experience is both the
> look and ease of use of applications, unfortunately all KDE programs
> have epically failed when it comes to the first.
>

Thats basically what i meant as well. When using it, it doesn't "feel good".
It doesn't fit, it's not smooth, things don't quite work right. And that's
not the typical OS X user experience. So calling it a non-beta would just be
an embarassment, i think.

leo



>
> >
> > It does make for an awful lot of redundant 2's otherwise.... :-)
> >
> > - Nikolaj
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amarok-devel mailing list
> > Amarok-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>



-- 
______________________________________________________
lfranchi at kde.org                       Tufts  University 2010
leonardo.franchi at tufts.edu         The KDE Project
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20090603/13495e03/attachment-0001.htm